HP OMEN Laptop 15-en0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN Laptop 15-en0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8788
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 05:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 70.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 823
83% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8788) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.02
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 20.6
13% 41.5 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 17
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 853 797 802 894 846 841 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,544
Write 2,186
Mixed 1,811
SusWrite 839
412% 1,845 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 79.9
268% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 939
698% 926 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 277%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 29.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN Laptop 15-en0xxx Builds (Compare 1,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP OMEN Laptop 15-en0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback