Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 397
50% 380 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 50.7
32% 42 fps
MRender 51.4
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 37.7
36% 45.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 73 91 92 98 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 230
Write 90.6
Mixed 125
SusWrite 84.7
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 5.5
60% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 71.2
60% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 46%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
1TB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 5.8 4.5 7.3 8.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 61.1
Write 5.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 6.2
15% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 36%
ASMT 2115 640GB
596GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 90 88 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 88.7
Write 54.5
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 89.8
93% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback