Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime5 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 08:58
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 343
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gigabyte(1458 3513) 1.2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 29.6
22% 32.2 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 27.2
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
556GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 441
Write 319
Mixed 346
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 26.6
106% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 75.4
81% 137 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
114GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 501
Write 349
Mixed 353
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 20.5
97% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 65.5
76% 132 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 118%
ASMT 2115 640GB
241GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Read 12.9
Write 8.89
Mixed 10.4
13% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.001
4K Write 0.001
4K Mixed 0.02
1% 0.006 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 38%
WDC WD64 00AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
231GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
Read 60.2
Write 59.1
Mixed 65.9
80% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.29
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback