Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L650D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L650D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110127
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 15:56
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P320-$20
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Memory 38
1-Core 28
2-Core 48.8
24% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 45.8
8-Core 54.8
6% 50.3 Pts
64-Core 54.2
3% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Toshiba(1179 FD18) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.57 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1
1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 3.6 11 61 3.2 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.1% Very poor
Read 152
Write 102
Mixed 107
SusWrite 37.5
22% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
10% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 R534G1601S1S 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L650D Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L650D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback