Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 19:03
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 1.60GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 107
50% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 347
34% 275 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 86.7
54% 72 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 45.9
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N510+ 960GB
674GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0618A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 35 219 212 218 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 238
Write 214
Mixed 218
SusWrite 151
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 20.4
78% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
14% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
241GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 141 140 125 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 141
Write 158
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 134
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
98% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79%
Great: 108%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 124GB
55GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.32% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.82 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 0.32%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GV7BMR4C 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback