Today's hottest deals

Biostar A880G+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A880G+  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 20:18
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 109
55% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 291
30% 243 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB
CLim: 1009 MHz, MLim: 1115 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 10.5
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 12.2
11% 14.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OYUNKEY 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 191 196 121 49 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 224
Write 199
Mixed 197
SusWrite 154
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 13.9
75% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 17
22% 38 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 86%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 124GB
109GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 23 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 23.6
Mixed 23
SusWrite 21.7
31% 23 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A880G+ Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A880G+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback