Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 17:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 350
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 30.6
20% 28.8 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 21.5
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 56 58 66 72 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 76.6
Write 84.4
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 62.6
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
460GB free
Firmware: AM001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 111 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 111
65% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback