EVGA 131-IB-E695

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemEVGA E695 0.0
MotherboardEVGA 131-IB-E695  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 16:06
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 186
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 467
51% 402 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 99.4
54% 74.5 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 46.1
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
841GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 224 217 229 228 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.9% Good
Read 238
Write 240
Mixed 222
SusWrite 225
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 33.3
112% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 192
145% 195 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 121%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 377
Write 297
Mixed 186
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 26.8
94% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 149
157% 261 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
390GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 60 60 57 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 55
Mixed 52
SusWrite 57.4
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 131-IB-E695 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA 131-IB-E695

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback