EVGA 131-IB-E695

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEVGA E695 0.0
MotherboardEVGA 131-IB-E695  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 11:02
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 230
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 545
58% 463 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 90.3
54% 71.5 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 46.3
48% 60.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 434 437 439 444 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 417
Mixed 264
SusWrite 431
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 29.3
103% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 161
170% 282 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 114%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
615GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 238 237 239 239 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.5% Very good
Read 254
Write 240
Mixed 232
SusWrite 236
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 37.3
122% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 146
118% 164 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 121%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
390GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 59 59 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 50.6
Write 53.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 58
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0D6F U28E570
Typical 131-IB-E695 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA 131-IB-E695

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback