Today's hottest deals

Medion P6689 MD62500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion P6689 MD62500  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION E15KRR
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 10:06
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 192
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 337
35% 279 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1B0A 22C4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 6.8
4% 14 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW512HMJP-00000 256GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 772
Write 551
Mixed 528
137% 617 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 31.9
107% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 235
204% 298 MB/s
Seagate ST1500LM012-1R817G 1.5TB
156GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 80 89 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 57.4
Write 75.7
Mixed 51
SusWrite 89.2
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
171% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43EB1-CPB 029E CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 9.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6689 MD62500 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P6689 MD62500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback