Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 02:22
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 153
57% 100 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 294
31% 249 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 61 69 105 114 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 117
Write 108
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 90.8
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 109%
hp v232w 64GB
54GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 0.5 4.2 6 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.01% Terrible
Read 28.1
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 4.2
7% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CB 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback