Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 484
65% 487 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.9% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 57
Parallax 49
46% 54 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 45.2
38% 45.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pioneer APS-SL2-120 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0724A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 31 28 30 40 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 449
Write 358
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 42.9
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 7.7
40% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 1.1
64% 149 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
68GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 111 113 116 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 66
SusWrite 116
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 11.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2V-CF Builds (Compare 488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback