Asus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive488% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 11:36
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 177
2-Core 341
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 658
8-Core 962
101% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,224
76% 1,224 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 147
Parallax 108
86% 120 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 94.3
94% 119 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3344 3346 3388 2406 1639 1701 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
488% Outstanding
Read 3,009
Write 3,458
Mixed 3,123
SusWrite 2,637
690% 3,057 MB/s
4K Read 87
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 126
419% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,855
DQ Write 1,594
DQ Mixed 1,707
1,284% 1,719 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 488%
Great: 477%
Pioneer APS-SL2-120 120GB
95GB free
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 413 355 390 373 345 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 422
Mixed 348
SusWrite 385
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 23
140% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 29.5
71% 147 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 108 107 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 338
Write 109
Mixed 142
SusWrite 107
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 25
125% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 107
84% 116 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 36.7
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 30.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 0" 1280 720 IPS0001 IPS001
Typical TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 3,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback