Biostar H110MHC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H110MHC  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display960 x 540 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 08:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$46
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 10
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 120
38% 75 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 204
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 1240 MHz, MLim: 480 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 5.7
0% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 5.9
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
671GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 135 130 132 163 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 151
Mixed 36
SusWrite 143
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 107%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 14 7.8 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Read 26.7
Write 15.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 11.4
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ZION4GBDDR4PC2400 02B5 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 403
10% 403 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110MHC Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H110MHC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback