Dell Latitude E7240

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E7240  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 08YF01
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 59
2-Core 109
53% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 4.8
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N mSATA 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM45D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 234 106 130 122 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 447
Write 161
Mixed 212
SusWrite 154
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 33.8
126% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 129
125% 205 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 94%
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 250GB
50GB free
Firmware: RVT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 316 307 307 308 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 458
Mixed 438
SusWrite 318
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 52.4
172% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 365
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 V01L3S84GB52852813 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7240 Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback