Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 43.7 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 41.8 24% 35.8 Pts	4-Core 45 8-Core 45.6 6% 45.3 Pts	64-Core 44.1 3% 44.1 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 B120) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.81 Parallax 2.19 1% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 4.09 2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56 10,555 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFZ10.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 59 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 54 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C2) HDA temperature 59 46 231929675817 (F1) Unknown 100 100 16189	61.7% Good	Read 366 Write 410 Mixed 452 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 8.91 68% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 59.7 DQ Write 58.4 DQ Mixed 8.97 20% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.M16F CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM