| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20141202 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 24 '17 at 02:36 |
| Run Duration | 269 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.8%
Above average
|
47% 71.9 Pts
|
21% 162 Pts
|
12% 191 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.5%
Above average
|
48% 64.2 fps
|
58% 71.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
33.7%
Below average
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
17% 6.07 GB/s
|
50% 80.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,876 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 516x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 328x |
| FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 186x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $171 |