Asrock Z77 Extreme6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJun 24 '17 at 15:45
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 337
47% 346 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2773) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 32% Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
231GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 491
Write 198
Mixed 287
71% 325 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 20.5
92% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 78.1
88% 151 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
36GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 502
Write 299
Mixed 351
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 33.4
115% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 41.6
53% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 361
Write 71.4
Mixed 121
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 8.79
67% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 8.68
23% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBSR 8313 CL9-9-9 D3-1600 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBSR 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme6 - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback