Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-C (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130830
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '21 at 00:37
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 156 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 211 29% 213 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E151) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 9.1 Parallax 5.8 0% 5.03 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 7.5 6% 7 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 39 36 55 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 51 Write 13 Mixed 16 SusWrite 36 21% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 48% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 70%
Virtual Disk 188GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.46% Terrible	Read 5 Write 10 Mixed 5 SusWrite 5.6 5% 6.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.8 334% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 18%
Virtual Disk 1TB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 0GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 9.7 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 5.6 6% 7.53 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.3 213% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.93% Terrible	Read 21 Write 3.5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 3.3 9% 8.65 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.6 93% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.93% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GB 7,085 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 7.7 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	111x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	79x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	118x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	53x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353