Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S8  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2939-B1
Memory1.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 11:52
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 134
57% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 399
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt512g TOSHIBA 512GB
217GB free
Firmware: 0108ADLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 747 535 416 417 415 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 715
Write 658
Mixed 676
SusWrite 545
146% 649 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 53.2
167% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 539
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 440
332% 449 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 135%
Great: 165%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 500GB
148GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 318 323 316 323 322 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,236
Write 383
Mixed 574
SusWrite 329
139% 630 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 38.4
184% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 194
148% 204 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 133%
Great: 139%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 599GB
492GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 32 31 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 29.7
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 32.3
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3
1,787% 13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 151%
Great: 151%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 480GB
129GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 120 358 350 359 359 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 76% Great: 182%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 500GB
315GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.3 1.7 1.9 2.7 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 7.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 2.3
10% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- 4x8GB
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY RX300 S8 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback