Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S8  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2939-B1
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 11:40
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 115
52% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 495
42% 364 Pts
64-Core 1,011
63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt512g TOSHIBA 512GB
214GB free
Firmware: 0108ADLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 674 665 673 671 670 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 815
Write 725
Mixed 720
SusWrite 682
166% 736 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 55
165% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 583
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 467
354% 481 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 148%
Great: 165%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 599GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 17 18 8.9 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 64.8
Write 8
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 14.3
19% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
54% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 151%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 999GB
772GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 250
Write 17.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 20.1
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 179%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 500GB
319GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 2.1 2.7 3.6 2.2 1.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 2.5
6% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.4% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY RX300 S8 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback