Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSupermicro X10DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAI
Memory119 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 20:27
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 810
72% 607 Pts
64-Core 4,209
260% 4,209 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.9% Above average
Lighting 78.3
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 112
64% 86.6 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 81.8
Splatting 42.7
49% 62.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KB96 960GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 349 351 346 352 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 354
Write 369
Mixed 305
SusWrite 350
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 13.4
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 21.2
80% 174 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 86%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
888GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 372 376 375 353 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 503
Write 435
Mixed 427
SusWrite 367
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 19.1
68% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 34.6
96% 204 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$154
615GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 397 398 398 397 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 501
Write 447
Mixed 416
SusWrite 396
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 25.8
57% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 34.1
92% 194 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40CB1-CRC M393A2K40CB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40CB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40CB1-CRC M393A2K40CB1-CRC 128GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
125% Outstanding
MC Read 73.2
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 44.8
144% 50.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 125%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback