Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateJun 25 '17 at 16:24
Run Duration519 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 185
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 343
44% 335 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 2GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 32.6
22% 29.6 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 34.6
23% 27.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 138
Mixed 116
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.26
107% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 83%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
539GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 85.9
Write 76.1
Mixed 79.1
61% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.39
105% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
334GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 109
Write 92.6
Mixed 96.7
75% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.33
84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 102 8GB
2GB free, PID 162d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Read 11.6
Write 2.23
Mixed 3.61
6% 5.82 MB/s
4K Read 2.79
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.008
11% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9W 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback