| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190813 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 18 '21 at 00:09 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.7%
Above average
|
63% 112 Pts
|
34% 261 Pts
|
18% 297 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$170
ASRock(1849 5031) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.1%
Average
|
43% 61.9 fps
|
43% 53.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
668GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 43 89 89 85 95 MB/s
|
52.9%
Above average
|
62% 84.8 MB/s
|
118% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
27.7%
Poor
|
27% 9.47 GB/s
|
22% 7.73 GB/s
|
36% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,947 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,140x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $110Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 999x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $148Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 291x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 373x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $152Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 312x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 244x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 102% - Outstanding | Total price: $236 |