Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080403
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 07:08
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6850-$57
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 68.1
42% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 67.1
8-Core 68.8
9% 67.9 Pts
64-Core 67.5
4% 67.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60% Above average
Lighting 80.3
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 91.5
65% 81.7 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 47
49% 62.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VM100-31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 43 36 39 43 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 39
Write 46.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 39.1
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 32%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
446GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 111 114 111 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 59.7
Write 100
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 114
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X38T-DQ6 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback