Asrock B250 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B250 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$36
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Memory 6.88
1-Core 5.7
2-Core 4
4% 5.53 Pts
4-Core 9.4
8-Core 170
8% 89.9 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 231 129 156 231 161 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 205
Write 75.4
Mixed 304
SusWrite 182
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 7.4
25% 8.13 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 88.5
70% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 234%
M.2 SATA III SSD 240GB
191GB free
Firmware: SBFMB1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 146 77 78 117 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 70.9
Write 66.5
SusWrite 115
19% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 4
8% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 94%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120G 120GB
97GB free, PID 6388
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 88 100 89 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Read 19.1
Write 14.2
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 92.2
54% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
131% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 859B CT4G4DFS824A.C8FDD2 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.36% Terrible
MC Read 0.1
MC Write 0.5
MC Mixed 1
2% 0.53 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 434
9% 434 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250 Pro4 Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock B250 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback