Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 14:28
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 86.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 314
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,194
108% 909 Pts
64-Core 2,179
135% 2,179 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 155
Parallax 146
119% 149 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 142
Splatting 115
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 112 110 111 108 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 363
Write 148
Mixed 180
SusWrite 112
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 24.2
84% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 110
92% 134 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 73%
M.2 SATA III SSD 240GB
137GB free
Firmware: SBFMB1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 149 146 149 205 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 324
Write 136
Mixed 162
SusWrite 204
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 20.6
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 35
27% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 94%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 271 272 272 273 273 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 450
Mixed 373
SusWrite 291
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 51.7
173% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 156
129% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 118%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: 401100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 442 440 449 450 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 442
Mixed 319
SusWrite 445
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 48.7
167% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 194
148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 44.4
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 38.8
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $991
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback