Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 08:59
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 115
2-Core 200
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 625
60% 494 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 8
4% 6.97 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 14.2
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 58 60 59 57 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 465
Write 335
Mixed 310
SusWrite 88.3
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 40.4
135% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 116
94% 134 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
516GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 132 131 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 142
Write 141
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 130
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48% Average
Read 92.2
Write 107
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 98.1
124% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.2
154% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48%
Great: 64%
hp x765w 32GB
9GB free, PID 6d40
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 24 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 192
Write 42.6
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 25.5
64% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK16GX4M1D3000C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 30.8
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 27.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback