Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 04:57
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 772
75% 614 Pts
64-Core 1,194
74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
EVGA(3842 3172) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 140
Parallax 140
114% 140 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 121
Splatting 110
108% 136 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 372 204 151 145 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 484
Write 401
Mixed 337
SusWrite 231
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 36
126% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 128
102% 144 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
694GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67% Good
Read 102
Write 88.3
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 131
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67%
Great: 109%
WD Game Drive 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 103 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 68.9
Write 106
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 101
124% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
293% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 65%
Generic Mass-Storage 256GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 18.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 18.7
26% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 4.5
295% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 34.9
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 30.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 106%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback