Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 20:53
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$203
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 103
47% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 297
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 37.5
29% 37.7 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 26.9
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 41 58 62 65 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 71.8
Write 74.3
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 56
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback