Asus TUF Gaming FA706II_FX706II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FA706II_FX706II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706II
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 14:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 817
86% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16EF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.20.02
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 21
13% 33.9 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 17.1
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 224 217 217 217 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 908
Mixed 958
SusWrite 233
198% 895 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 75.7
268% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 735
DQ Mixed 577
470% 664 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 188%
Great: 189%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 111 115 114 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 167
Write 117
Mixed 74
SusWrite 110
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 36.6
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FA706II_FX706II Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus TUF Gaming FA706II_FX706II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback