Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-7010 APU (2015 M.Ca) 1,594 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 44.4 1-Core 21.2 2-Core 39 24% 34.9 Pts	4-Core 39.1 8-Core 41.7 5% 40.4 Pts	64-Core 39.3 2% 39.3 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 7,644 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3808) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2801.1002 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.03 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VC 256GB 959 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 143 188 222 211 235 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 398 Write 290 Mixed 315 SusWrite 204 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 26.7 83% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 92.1 69% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Null R538G1601S2S 1x8GB 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	97x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	64x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 4,472 samples	18x

SSD
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	65x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	43x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBNullBench 17%, 621 samples	34x

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $30

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16