Today's hottest deals

MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7918
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 02:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 658
70% 558 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 77.5
76% 86.6 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 71.2
59% 72 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 221 222 221 221 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 178
Mixed 307
SusWrite 229
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 46.7
167% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 1
43% 93.7 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
153GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 469 438 367 329 326 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 473
Mixed 422
SusWrite 366
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 47.7
171% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 1
53% 116 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 126%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB
857GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 40
Write 34.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 5.4
34% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
930GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 41.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 37.2
48% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) Builds (Compare 2,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback