Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$186 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 645 63% 516 Pts	64-Core 837 52% 837 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Graphics 1,316 User benchmarks, average bench 20% AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 44.3 Parallax 31.6 16% 32 fps	MRender 43.4 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 32.2 27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 32%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g TOSHIBA 512GB 10,256 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 634 Write 563 Mixed 658 138% 618 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 44.3 142% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 56.7 111% 224 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 24.9 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 24.6 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	154x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	29x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	24x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	24x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	15x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	13x

RAM
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,582 samples	16x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	14x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	13x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $186