HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 240 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 868A
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 04:00
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 207
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 313
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 868A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 7.6
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0C1C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 94 97 96 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 89.6
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
563GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 53 57 59 75 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 89.3
Write 101
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 70
108% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
152% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 240 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback