Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '21 at 18:28
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$315
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 67.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
91% 174 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1,151
100% 852 Pts
64-Core 2,142
133% 2,142 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
EVGA(3842 2277) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 119
Parallax 138
115% 133 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 136
Splatting 110
114% 144 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
632GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1973 921 951 948 941 942 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,999
Write 3,564
Mixed 2,165
SusWrite 1,112
500% 2,210 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 81.1
272% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,337
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 1,222
915% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 287%
Great: 492%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TB
105GB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 273 276 282 278 277 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 424
Write 438
Mixed 372
SusWrite 284
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 38.6
121% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 202
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
487GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 90.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 125
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 160 164 164 163 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 122
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 161
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 96%
Drobo 5C 70.5TB
54TB free, PID 3443
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 73 83 76 83 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 173
Write 89.2
Mixed 148
SusWrite 79.1
156% 122 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.3
201% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 89%
USB 3.0 Drobo S - Gen 2 17.5TB
5TB free, PID 000a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 30 31 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 50.3
Write 5.2
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 30.6
28% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.7
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $696
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback