Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '18 at 22:24
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7960X-$350
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 1,074
94% 802 Pts
64-Core 2,953
183% 2,953 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 149
Parallax 143
121% 147 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 151
Splatting 110
104% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 499
Write 404
Mixed 416
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 15.2
89% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 20.5
DQ Mixed 8.89
10% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 124%
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe
118GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 716
Write 377
Mixed 400
110% 498 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 7.14
43% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 12.1
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 5.45
7% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
554GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 63.9
Mixed 41.4
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.61
4K Mixed 0.12
32% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
554GB free
Firmware: ML6OA180 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 75.2
Mixed 61.9
50% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.15
39% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$29
415GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 93.4
Mixed 110
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.44
117% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$170
189GB free
Firmware: CC3H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44% Average
Read 76.2
Write 77.1
Mixed 74.4
57% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.38
85% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44%
Great: 66%
USB 3.0 Drobo S - Gen 2 17.5TB
12TB free, PID 000a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 151
Write 108
Mixed 126
159% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2.07
4K Write 3.47
4K Mixed 0.02
127% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.5% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 23.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 10.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback