Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 05:14
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 295
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 772
84% 667 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 49%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 48 77 47 68 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
44% Average
Read 453
Write 224
Mixed 182
SusWrite 63
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 12.8
49% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 33.1
60% 118 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$55
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 190 193 196 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 194
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 194
107% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
1GB free, PID fafa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 10.4
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 11
14% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M2A2400C16 Adata CMK8GX4M2A2400C16 Adata 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback