Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 04:50
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 696
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.2% Good
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 74.9
64% 77 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 60.3
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 462 455 452 456 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 474
Mixed 460
SusWrite 441
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.9
176% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 317
233% 305 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 114%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GISB CL16-18-18 D4-3000 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 35.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 30.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback