Asus PRO A320M-R WI-FI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRO A320M-R WI-FI  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 07:05
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 679
70% 565 Pts
64-Core 914
57% 914 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Dell(1028 1905) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.14524.5002
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 145
Parallax 180
105% 151 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 132
Splatting 77.3
87% 110 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900E13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 115 55 78 87 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.5% Average
Read 198
Write 99.8
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 91.4
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 11.5
65% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 93.6
100% 167 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
382GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 163 166 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 91.9
Write 109
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 169
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
301GB free
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 54 60 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 59.1
Mixed 26
SusWrite 58.6
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 58%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
143GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 63.1
Write 66.9
Mixed 44
SusWrite 76.7
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GISB CL16-18-18 D4-3000 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 33.1
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 28.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 6R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 38% 42 346 286 120 23.6" 1920 1080 VTK0236 GFV24C
Typical PRO A320M-R WI-FI Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRO A320M-R WI-FI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback