Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 49.8 1-Core 42.3 2-Core 76.8 35% 56.3 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 242 23% 190 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Acer(1025 1265) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 28.7 Reflection 34.4 Parallax 28.8 23% 30.6 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 18.3 20% 25.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 25%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1264) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.74% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 2.5 3% 2.93 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.5 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.74% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 97 69 78 80 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 443 Write 415 Mixed 362 SusWrite 114 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 30 98% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 265 202% 276 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 121%
Gigabyte GP-AG42TB 2TB 2,140 User benchmarks, average bench 374% 1TB free Firmware: EGFM13.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 996 1195 1050 1132 1383 1030 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 1,458 Write 1,382 Mixed 1,385 SusWrite 1,131 302% 1,339 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 41.8 135% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 455 DQ Write 379 DQ Mixed 434 320% 422 MB/s
Poor: 204% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 522%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 469GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 82 85 85 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 81.8 Write 84.3 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 83.4 94% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Transcend JM2400HSB-8G 12GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 14.1 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,879x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,498x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	684x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	824x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	253x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	195x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	599x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	408x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	276x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16