| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS H910 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU FJNB220 |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110714 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 14 '21 at 15:47 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
68.2%
Good
|
68% 115 Pts
|
44% 353 Pts
|
26% 417 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 3000M
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.99
|
5.76%
Terrible
|
5% 7.93 fps
|
6% 8.13 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 350 354 355 356 356 MB/s
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
77% 344 MB/s
|
91% 30.2 MB/s
|
148% 261 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
50.5%
Above average
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
45% 15.6 GB/s
|
53% 75 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS H910 Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H910
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2860QMIntel $469Bench 62%, 4,317 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-2920XMIntelBench 62%, 906 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-2640MIntelBench 54%, 12,152 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples | 8x |
| Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples | 5x |
| Quadro 5010MNvidiaBench 10%, 111 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $469 |