Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 31.9 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 57.6 28% 46.1 Pts	4-Core 79.1 8-Core 81 11% 80.1 Pts	64-Core 81.3 5% 81.3 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0457) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.79% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.79% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 256GB 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 187 68 75 32 65 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.7% Poor	Read 233 Write 201 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 106 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 1.2 25% 7.37 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 19.2 DQ Mixed 24 36% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 2x4GB 380 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 8.2 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	62x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	22x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	6x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	5x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	4x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $205

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16