Today's hottest deals

Samsung 700A7L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSamsung 700A7L  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG DM700A7L-K24
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161114
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 05:18
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4405U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 69.7
40% 59 Pts
4-Core 73.8
8-Core 104
11% 88.9 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 510
Sanyo(144D C134) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 38 33 32 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 292
Write 51.9
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 32.6
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 18
60% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 57
DQ Mixed 58.5
76% 145 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
339GB free
Firmware: AM003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 76 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 39.3
Write 59
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 91.8
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E8E324EB-EGCG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback