Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 45.7 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 40.9 34% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 56.4 8-Core 56 8% 56.2 Pts	64-Core 56.6 4% 56.6 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0447) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 174 46 45 22 69 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.2% Poor	Read 204 Write 170 Mixed 173 SusWrite 90.9 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.4 24% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 240GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 69 71 71 70 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 74.5 Write 64.6 Mixed 30 SusWrite 70.1 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80 M471B5773DH0-CH9 AD80 HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 7.4 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6.2 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	422x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	114x
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	76x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBAD80Bench 22%, 601 samples	34x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBCE80Bench 22%, 419 samples	26x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	25x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158