Today's hottest deals

Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '17 at 01:17
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 902
83% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,338
83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 31.1
27% 34.3 fps
MRender 47.3
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 43.3
34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
926GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 412
Mixed 419
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 40.5
151% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 52.2
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 81.6
70% 99.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
926GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 504
Write 338
Mixed 346
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 32.3
132% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 69
78% 134 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
533GB free
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 128%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$120
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,906
Write 1,532
Mixed 1,549
370% 1,662 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 31.6
166% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 45.5
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 32.1
38% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 222%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 35.9
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 33.1
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback