Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 16:47
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$141
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 308
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 762
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 112
Parallax 102
90% 108 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HS-SSD-C2000 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 344 347 262 267 261 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,051
Write 631
Mixed 402
SusWrite 302
132% 596 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 61.6
203% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 347
342% 546 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 153%
Great: 203%
Vaseky V800/500G 512GB
71GB free
Firmware: R0822A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 37 28 40 21 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 501
Write 450
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 60.5
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 0.6
55% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 1
27% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 65%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
154GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 96 96 115 96 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 372
Write 89.8
Mixed 353
SusWrite 108
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 6.5
89% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 8.1
68% 152 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 86%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$40
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 126 122 124 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 72
SusWrite 124
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA44UG-MEC1U2AW1 VMA44UG-MEC1U2AW1 VMA42UG-MEC1U2AW1 VMA42UG-MEC1U2AW1 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.5% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 30.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 29.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback