Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 07:13
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 871
84% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 217
Parallax 234
194% 229 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 161
Splatting 141
135% 169 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 159%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 476 481 483 479 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 484
Mixed 452
SusWrite 480
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 52.3
173% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
70GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 267 212 173 167 237 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 228
Mixed 287
SusWrite 256
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 50.8
171% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 248
215% 319 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
520GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2373 2197 1402 1428 1447 1449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,546
Write 2,367
Mixed 1,848
SusWrite 1,716
476% 2,119 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 72.6
235% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 935
DQ Mixed 1,084
816% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 329%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$85
814GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 110 116 119 119 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 62.1
Write 98.3
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 117
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 90%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$99
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 117 118 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 97.4
Write 104
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 116
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$110
838GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 103 105 104 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 49.1
Write 76.4
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 102
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
201% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 90%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
820GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.9 1.1 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 133
Write 1.2
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 1.5
25% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$66
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.6% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.2
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 2,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $756
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback