Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 20:47
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 508
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 869D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 106
Parallax 109
93% 110 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 92.3
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
44GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 74 78 78 74 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 191
Write 126
Mixed 156
SusWrite 78.8
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 11.5
62% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 29.2
50% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
500GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 119 153 165 152 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 162
Write 163
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 139
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
781GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 116 124 126 128 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 102
Write 60.4
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 120
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
984GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 133 134 136 135 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 174
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 130
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.4
256% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
789GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 118 126 130 128 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 158
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 122
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 113%
hp v221w 16GB
15GB free, PID f807
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.4 7.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Read 23
Write 6.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 7.2
13% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 7%
WD My Passport 0829 2TB
851GB free, PID 0829
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 104 106 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 97.8
Write 98.4
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 104
121% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-4GTD Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 04CD F3-2400C10-4GTD Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 OC Formula Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback