Medion invalid

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMedion invalid  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '21 at 12:29
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 409
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39% Below average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 48.7
Parallax 64.1
41% 54.3 fps
MRender 48.2
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 34.2
36% 44.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 529 255 269 260 271 264 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 530
Write 648
Mixed 610
SusWrite 308
118% 524 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 52.9
185% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 586
448% 609 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
931GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 465 472 484 484 483 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 411
Mixed 382
SusWrite 471
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 42.1
125% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 324
246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965684-012.A00G KHX2666C16D4/4G 9965684-012.A00G KHX2666C16D4/4G 24GB
2400, 2667, 2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 27.5
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical invalid Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Medion invalid

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback